By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Peoples MindPeoples MindPeoples Mind
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Reading: Court voids ARCON’s N60bn fine against Facebook Nigeria
Share
Font ResizerAa
Peoples MindPeoples Mind
Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
News

Court voids ARCON’s N60bn fine against Facebook Nigeria

Iriche Emmanuel
Last updated: July 7, 2026 2:40 pm
Iriche Emmanuel
Published: July 7, 2026
Share
SHARE

A Federal High Court in Lagos has struck down the N60 billion sanction the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON) imposed on Facebook Nigeria Operations Limited, ruling that the regulator lacked legal authority and violated the company’s right to a fair hearing.

 

In a judgment delivered on June 18, 2026, in Suit No. FHC/L/CS/2205/2024, Justice Yellim Bogoro declared ARCON’s Notice of Violation/Demand for Compliance dated October 21, 2024, unconstitutional, unlawful, null and void.

 

The court issued a perpetual injunction barring ARCON from enforcing the notice against Facebook Nigeria.

 

ARCON had accused Facebook Nigeria of running unapproved advertisements on Facebook and Instagram without clearance from the Advertising Standards Panel, as required under the ARCON Act and the Nigerian Code of Advertising.

 

The council ordered the company to halt the ads and pay N60 billion for what it termed repeated violations, or face prosecution.

 

Represented by Mofesomo Tayo-Oyetibo, SAN, Facebook Nigeria argued that ARCON cannot determine criminal liability or impose penalties through an administrative notice without a fair hearing.

The company also stated it does not own or operate Facebook or Instagram, both platforms are controlled by Meta Platforms Inc., a separate foreign entity.

 

ARCON, through its counsel, Akinlolu Kehinde, SAN, maintained that Facebook Nigeria represents Meta’s local operations and should be held responsible for ads shown to Nigerian users.

 

Justice Bogoro rejected ARCON’s position on several grounds including that no evidence that Facebook Nigeria owns, operates, or controls Facebook or Instagram, mere assertions of representation were insufficient to establish liability, ARCON violated Section 36 of the Constitution by imposing a substantial financial sanction without giving Facebook Nigeria a chance to respond, and that Section 57(4) of the ARCON Act requires a fair hearing before penalties.

 

The judge ruled that the N60 billion demand was, in substance, a fine and ultra vires ARCON’s statutory powers.

IPOB demands action over US lawmakers seeking Nnamdi Kanu’s release
NUC licences Transatlantic University of Medicine, clears institution for academic activities
Qatar condemns bandits’ attack on Zamfara village, extends condolences
FCT: Police seek public’s help to find man missing since January
Military personnel allegedly shoots labourer to death in Ogun Olayinka Olukoya February 24, 2026
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories

  • ES Money
  • U.K News
  • The Escapist
  • Insider
  • Science
  • Technology
  • LifeStyle
  • Marketing

About US

We influence 20 million users and is the number one business and technology news network on the planet.

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]
© Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?