Media personality Ifedayo Olarinde, popularly known as Daddy Freeze, has questioned allegations linking the President’s Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila, to the controversial fake Federal Government agency, arguing that there is no publicly available evidence connecting him to the matter.
In a video shared on his Instagram page, Daddy Freeze cautioned against making serious allegations without verifiable proof, maintaining that accusations of such magnitude should be supported by credible evidence.
According to him, official transactions and high-value financial dealings typically leave documentary or electronic trails that investigators can verify.
“For me, I may be wrong, but it just looks like accusing an innocent man. He might not be innocent in every matter, but in this matter… make I ask you, how una see am?” he said.
Daddy Freeze’s remarks come amid growing public debate over allegations involving Prince Matthew Adeyemi, who has been accused of operating a fake Federal Government agency.
The media personality stressed that due process should be allowed to take its course and urged investigators to rely on facts rather than speculation in determining culpability.
Echoing similar concerns, a social media user identified as Raymond, popularly known as @princeraymond15, called on investigators to establish the source of the alleged N400 million reportedly used as a bribe in connection with the case.
Raymond argued that investigators should examine Adeyemi’s financial background, including any businesses, investments, or previous employment that could explain his capacity to raise such a substantial amount.
“N400 million is an enormous amount, and if such an allegation is being made, the source of those funds should be examined as part of any thorough investigation,” he said.
Meanwhile, fresh claims circulating online allege that Adeyemi, during an interview, denied ever meeting or speaking with Gbajabiamila and stated that he had no call records, documents, or other evidence linking the Chief of Staff to the alleged scheme.
The online claims also contend that a purported engagement letter allegedly issued by the Office of the Chief of Staff is not authentic.
